Comments on: Latest Lib Smear: Palin Was Not Against Bridge to Nowhere

By: yoyoyo

yoyoyo — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:10:49 +0000

Go back and check the facts. She welcomed the money, and only when it turned out that Alaska couldn’t shoulder its share of the bridge funding did she turn “against” the bridge. Except that she kept all of the federal funds to be used on other Alaskan projects.

It’s simply untrue that she opposed the bridge.

By: Andy B

Andy B — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:40:24 +0000

MUST READ: Keep in mind this is the liberal strategy. This comes from one Dem Underground on their grotesque speculation on a Palin pregnancy cover-up.

NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Sat Aug-30-08 10:26

122. What many here don’t understand. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. RUMOR IS TRUTH.

The modern laws of media hype and political warfare have a useful tenet:

Repeat ANYTHING or raise false concern over ANYTHING and it is likely to be planted in the conscious/subconscious of many voters.

If people start to think that there might be something fishy with Palin’s last kid (if hers), then that’s FINE. One more doubt (whether tied to reality or not) is another hesitation at the ballot box.

GET WITH THE PROGRAM PEOPLE. The “rising above it” bullshit has served us so well in the past, hasn’t it?

If you have problems with the story, then STFU and get out of the way of Dems who are engaged in MODERN POLITICAL WARFARE. Go tend your garden or some other pedestrian task, because the “concern trolls” are not helping shape the message.

By: S

Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:16:24 +0000

uhm, I have some bad news for you.

Its public record

http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html

She fully supported the Bridge To Nowhere.

Something tells me you are going to be doing a lot of this in the next 2 months though