Comments on: (PICTURES) Chicago 4th Of July Tea Party

By: The Anchoress — A First Things Blog

The Anchoress — A First Things Blog — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:32:48 +0000

[...] administration – should pay attention to what they’re hearing in these crowds and at tea parties. Our media are overpopulated with smug elitists, increasingly detached from the realities of life [...]

By: Dr. Jans Pacebags, esq.

Dr. Jans Pacebags, esq. — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:54:15 +0000

didn’t the intellectual, leftist elite tell us that dissent was patriotic for the last 8 years?

i’m confused–now it’s wrong to dissent?

it’s so hard keeping up with liberal pretzel-logic!

By: Lauren

Lauren — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:27:09 +0000

Cantusee–so, when we had Fox News covering (NOT backing) us, we were “astroturf”…yet when no MSM showed up, we’re suddenly not worth it? Screw you. We believe in our cause and we’re speaking out to that effect.

By: Drudge Potato Al

Drudge Potato Al — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:41:19 +0000

We’re your friends. We’re not like the others…

By: Dr. Jans Pacebags, esq.

Dr. Jans Pacebags, esq. — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:19:33 +0000

cantusee, what’s really going on?

By: CANTUSEE

CANTUSEE — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:53:04 +0000

I find almost hilarious that without your backers at Fox News these parties really went unnoticed, kind of like the Republican Party should be. You are all ridiculous and you need to get all the facts instead of just reading the Fox News talking points and regurgitating them as if they were own thoughts. Use your own mind, do your own research and maybe, maybe just maybe you will really understand what is going on!

By: Kent

Kent — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:39:07 +0000

I was there, though I got there at 1:30 or so. I was very disappointed to see that the Green Party seemed to have taken over the speaking. They were saying what we say, but considering this is a hard left group (Ralph Nader and co.), I felt the whole thing was a bit hijacked. They did have a Republican running for governor, though, so not all the info being passed out was an attempt to hoodwink conservatives into voting for the hard left next time around.

By: William G. Hyland Jr

William G. Hyland Jr — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:30:59 +0000

In celebration of the 4th of July, I offer this essay in defense of our greatest founding father, Thomas Jefferson. I feel Mr. Jefferson’s reputation has been unfairly eviscerated by a misrepresentation of the DNA results in the Hemings controversy. The exhumation of discredited, prurient embellishments has not only deluded readers, but impoverished a fair debate. In fact, with the possible exception of the Kennedy assassination, I am unaware of any major historical controversy riddled with so much misinformation and outright inaccuracies as the sex-oriented Sally Hemings libel.
The “Sally” story is pure fiction, possibly politics, but certainly not historical fact or science. It reflects a recycled inaccuracy that has metastasized from book to book, over two hundred years. In contrast to the blizzard of recent books spinning the controversy as a mini-series version of history, I found that layer upon layer of direct and circumstantial evidence points to a mosaic distinctly away from Jefferson. My research, evaluation, and personal interviews led me to one inevitable conclusion: the revisionist grip of historians have the wrong Jefferson–the DNA, as well as other historical evidence, matches perfectly to his younger brother, Randolph and his teen-age sons, as the true candidates for a sexual relationship with Sally.
A monopoly of books (all paternity believers) written since the DNA results have gone far beyond the evidence and transmuted conjecture into apparent fact, and in most instances, engaged in a careless misreading of the record. My new book, IN DEFENSE OF THOMAS JEFFERSON (Thomas Dunne Books, 2009), definitively destroys this myth, separating revisionist ideology from accuracy. It is historical hygiene by pen, an attempt to marshal facts, rationally dissect the evidence and prove beyond reasonable doubt that Jefferson is completely innocent of this sordid charge:
• the virulent rumor was first started by the scandal-mongering journalist James Callender, who burned for political revenge against Jefferson. Callender was described as “an alcoholic thug with a foul mind, obsessed with race and sex,” who intended to defame the public career of Jefferson.
• the one eyewitness to this sexual allegation was Edmund Bacon, Jefferson’s overseer at Monticello, who saw another man (not Jefferson) leaving Sally’s room ‘many a morning.’ Bacon wrote: “…I have seen him come out of her mother’s room many a morning when I went up to Monticello very early.”
• Jefferson’s deteriorating health would have prevented any such sexual relationship. He was 64 at the time of the alleged affair and suffered debilitating migraine headaches which incapacitated him for weeks, as well as severe intestinal infections and rheumatoid arthritis. He complained to John Adams: “My health is entirely broken down within the last eight months.”
• Jefferson owned three different slaves named Sally, adding to the historical confusion. Yet, he never freed his supposed lover and companion of 37 years, ‘Sally Hemings’ from her enslavement, nor mentioned her in his will.
• Randolph Jefferson, his younger brother, would have the identical Jefferson Y chromosome as his older brother, Thomas, that matched the DNA. Randolph had a reputation for socializing with Jefferson’s slaves and was expected at Monticello approximately nine months before the birth of Eston Hemings, Sally’s son who was the DNA match for a “male Jefferson.”
• The DNA match was to a male son of Sally’s. Randolph had six male sons. Thomas Jefferson had all female children with his beloved wife, Martha, except for a male who died in infancy.
• Until 1976, the oral history of Eston’s family held that they descended from a Jefferson “uncle.” Randolph was known at Monticello as “Uncle Randolph.”
• Unlike his brother, by taste and training Jefferson was raised as the perfect Virginia gentleman, a man of refinement and intellect. The personality of the man who figures in the Hemings soap opera cannot be attributed to the known nature of Jefferson, and would be preposterously out of character for him.

William G. Hyland Jr.
Attorney at Law
Tampa, FL.

By: Jason

Jason — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:29:09 +0000

I apologize here is the link to the 105 Tea Party videos. (sorry mod)

By: Reality

Reality — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:44:26 +0000

All I see here is idiots on the sidewalk. And not very many of them either. Good luck with your stupidity!