Nirther Me This…Another Birth Certificate Strikeout

August 2, 2009

[via Michelle Malkin's Hot Links]

Confederate Yankee Fisks the most recent fake “proof” that President Obama is not a US citizen. This time, it’s an alleged birth certificate from Kenya. One little problem though…

Directly to the right of that seal is the issue date of the document, the “17th day of February, 1964.”

The was no Republic of Kenya in February of 1964.

This stupidity must come to an end. There is no way Barack Obama is going to be stopped by his birth certificate. We’re talking about Democrats here. This is especially true if there is no real evidence, which there must not be, because if there was real evidence people wouldn’t be forging stuff to make the case.

Besides, it is almost misplaced to worry about Obama. Your focus of concern should be for the entire progressive movement. Defeat them and you will have defeated Barack Obama. Defeat Barack Obama, and you will have nothing much to defeat the progressive movement.

Which would you rather see happen?

Calm down. Check your anger. And defeat the movement.

UPDATE: More at LGF: The True Nirth Certifikate At Last

Tags: , , , , , , ,

14 Responses to Nirther Me This…Another Birth Certificate Strikeout

  1. [...] Nirther Me This…Another Birth Certificate Strikeout - Founding Bloggers [...]

  2. zeezil on August 3, 2009 at 12:26 am

    Kenya became independent on 12 December 1963 and prior to that Jomo Kenyatta (Kenya’s first president) had already formed a government.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya

  3. democratsarefascists on August 3, 2009 at 12:53 am

    This is such an obvious forgery that it can have only one source:

    Obama’s own nutroots followers.

  4. Jack on August 3, 2009 at 1:24 am

    QUESTION:

    What happens to Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation as Supreme Court Justice if the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” Presidential eligibility requirement is subsequently determined applicable to Barack Obama on the basis of Article 2’s exclusion of dual citizenship birth (doesn’t matter whether Obama born in Hawaii since his dad was Kenyan/British citizen at the time)? It would seem prudent, if not dereliction of Constitutional duty in not so doing, for the United States Senate to defer voting on Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation at the very least until there is determination, now imminent, on standing in Kerchner v. Congress (USDC NJ) on that precise issue (Congressional failure to take up the raised and known constitutional ineligibility question prior to declaring a Presidential winner in the vote of the electoral college). For the full Senate now to proceed to vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor (an otherwise lifetime appointment) before then, would be a knowing and very substantial exacerbation of any inherent Constitutional crisis — compounding the previous Congressional dereliction. That is, the Executive Branch, as well as conceivably all actions of a Congress under a President determined ineligible, would leave the Supreme Court as an essential unfettered remaining Branch of the Federal Government, that is unfettered so long as Mr. Obama’s nominee to the Court is not yet confirmed by the Senate.

    Will not one Senator, let alone Republican Senator, raise this issue on the Senate floor? The nation is watching.

    Leave a Reply

  5. bear1909 on August 3, 2009 at 2:11 am

    I agree with the strategy of defeating the liberal fascist movement (aka “progressive”).

    This issue has the potential to take down the following individuals along with it for voter fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, election fraud, and other numerous forms of criminal misconduct (because they know Obama is a fraud):

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
    Chairman, Democratic National Committee Howard Dean
    All State Election Officials

    That brief list of colluding officials in the Obama scam will bring down a good bit of the “progressive” movement.

    I am very curious where the fake Kenyan certificate came from. A standing President who has spent close to a million bucks to seal all of his records, including the birth certificate, can afford to pay others to discredit the eligibility movement with such shoddy fakes.

    Anyways..my money is on the real birth certificate being verified soon in Central California’s US District Court in the near future.

    Say Good Nite Beer Garden Barry.

    Bear1909 out.

  6. Linda on August 3, 2009 at 3:31 am

    Jan 20, 1964 Ann Dunham Obama files for divorce…kinda ironic that it was inauguration day

    Feb 17, 1964 … copy of Obama birth registration is sent out

    March 20, 1964…divorce becomes final

    it does not take too much intelligence to know that a US court of law would need proof of the birth father of the perported child for custody purposes, especially since Obama Sr was not present for the divorce and had not responded to the initial court requests.

    It is all documented and the date of Feb 1964 fits perfectly into the timeline of Ann’s court filings

    look for yourself…

    http://www.plainsradio.com/obama1.html

    we are not arm chairing this fight, we are going at it legally…get the picture arm chair pundit!

  7. Bill G. on August 3, 2009 at 6:46 am

    “There is no way Barack Obama is going to be stopped by his birth certificate”
    OK. However, the constitutional question on his birth certificate may just prove to be the wedge that puts a crack in the shield, and I want to see the shield broken.
    At present any politician with a “D” after their name is shielded from accountability.
    The old media, still the most potent in numbers reached, does not hold a democrat accountable for much of anything. When it does, it is only after it has been all over the new media. Barry is a worst case scenario.
    The birth certificate, the long form, might be the issue to begin to crack the shield.

  8. Asrai on August 3, 2009 at 7:35 am

    fakers will make attempts, no matter which side or what issue.

    be that as it may, someone please tell me what could BE more important than the eligibility of the person who occupies the most powerful office in the world?

    Sen. McCain was required to defend his ‘natural born citizen’ status to Congress. why not Obama?

  9. Anonanoano on August 3, 2009 at 9:26 am

    It might be that the real story is that he gave up his citizenship when he was adopted by his stepfather.

  10. Joseph Brown on August 3, 2009 at 9:35 am

    This guy, Obama, has more birth certificates than 6 other people I know!
    I don’t trust those Kenyans, anyway. I’m still waiting on the first gazillion bucks I was promised about 6 years ago.

  11. mcnorman on August 3, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    The issue that plagues most of us is not really the birth certificate per se. It is the issue of honesty.
    We cannot forget that these so called minor details or inconvenient truths can snowball and become one’s waterloo.
    Let’s not forget the arrogance of Richard Nixon. He truly believed that he was untouchable and slowly but surely, his walls came tumbling down.

  12. Carole Sluis on August 3, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    I put my money on Hillary Clinton!! If she couldn’t flush the original out…then nobody can. Can you imagine Hillary discovering the “AH HA!” moment. Wouldn’t she have loved it? There is no telling how much money she spent looking for that piece of evidence! I wish she had found it!!Later…

  13. admin on August 4, 2009 at 12:22 am

    Great point Carole. If there was dirt to dig she would have been the first one with a shovel.

  14. bus on August 4, 2009 at 1:08 am

    the most recent fake “proof” that President Obama is not a US citizen. who cares !!!!!!!!!

STATS



Links