Don’t Worry About The Anti-Muslim Backlash

November 8, 2009

Drudge is linking to an article about a potential anti-Muslim backlash:

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.

What a joke. What are we supposed to have after yet another Jihad attack? A pro-Muslim sentiment?? Besides, after 9/11, this country remained pogrom free. We have passed the civility test already. This latest drive to thwart “anti-Muslim sentiment” is a slap in the face to our grieving nation.

Worse still, this government had warning after warning about this terrorist. They did nothing but suck the tit of political correctness, and transfer this ticking Jihad bomb to a new post, rather than call him what he obviously was. How many other Jihadis are being ignored despite warning signs as obvious as in this case?

It is completely understandable that a Jihadi commits Jihad. That is what they do. It is unforgivable that the government puts political correctness ahead of the safety of its citizenry. Jihad is a fact of Islam that these morons deny at our peril.

The Democrats should be much more worried about an anti-government backlash than an anti-Muslim backlash.

Tags: , , , , ,

10 Responses to Don’t Worry About The Anti-Muslim Backlash

  1. mcnorman on November 9, 2009 at 10:53 am

    Unbelievable.

    We must not hesitate to say what we see for fear of being labeled politically incorrect by the likes of Aunt Janet and company.

    There are no words that can eloquently express the disgust that I feel for Auntie Janet and the PC crowd.

  2. BackwardsBoy on November 9, 2009 at 11:37 am

    If there was ever a reason to abandon the concepts of politically correctness and multiculturalism, the massacre at Ft. Hood is it.

  3. Adambomb on November 10, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    Amazing. Islam strikes again, and the first impulse of our secretary of US Homeland Security is to protect “muslims” from anti-muslim sentiment. Why isn’t your first instinct to protect residents of other US army bases from sleepers like hassan you stupid retard.

  4. WakeUpDummies on November 10, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Dems are arguing the fact that he screamed Alluha Akbar, or WTF he yelled, doesn’t mean he did it under Muslim pretenses? What? That’s like denying a KKK member yelling “White power” isn’t acting on behalf of his racist viewpoint. I’m so sick and f’in tired of our government acting like an abuse victim defending their attacker…”no no no, it’s my fault. I’m such a bad country I deserve what I get. He didn’t mean it, he really loves me.” FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD PLEASE STOP PUTTING THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF CRIMINALS, TERRORISTS AND THE ENEMIES OF THE USA BEFORE THE RIGHTS OF ITS CITIZENS WHO LIVE AND DIE TO PROTECT IT AND UPHOLD ITS MORAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS!!!!

  5. [...] attacks, why would there be any reason to believe the reaction would be any different in this case? As we have written before, the West has already passed this particular civility test. __________________ Upcoming [...]

  6. Paul on November 10, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    When I was a child during the height of WWII my mother and I took a cross-country train trip. In our car was a soldier traveling in uniform and carrying his rifle. He carried it easily everywhere he went, even in the diner. Passengers reacted with warmth and pride.

    Polite and reserved, he looked to my young eyes like any young adult who pumped gas or played baseball. but different, the eyes of the newly-initiated into manhood.

    The predictable and politically correct ‘solution’ will most likely be even more draconian gun control measures on base. If the Armed Forces is no longer willing to trust its people with the tools of their trade, I predict more military terror incidents against our disarmed brothers and sisters in arms.

    El Crepitor Viejo

  7. [...] attacks, why would there be any reason to believe the reaction would be any different in this case? As we have written before, the West has already passed this particular civility test. Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]

  8. David Rupp on November 11, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    We have a weak,unqualified,social engineer who through the perversions of our political system has been annointed President. His priorities do not include the safety of our citizens but the political tolerance of our enemies. Under his leadership the United States is in danger.

  9. PeaceableGuy on November 11, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    When Islam’s holy book states that the goal of Islam is world domination through any means necessary, that lying to enemies is moral, and that Islam’s enemies include anyone who is not a good Muslim… I choose to take Islam’s holy book at its word.

  10. [...] attacks, why would there be any reason to believe the reaction would be any different in this case? As we have written before, the West has already passed this particular civility [...]

TEACHING RADICAL

Jon David Kahn “American Heart”



Links